|
Post by Pachirisu on Aug 4, 2017 7:05:31 GMT -5
I would like to see your honest opinion on if you seem to dislike or like any of the Who Wants to be a Millionaire formats. Does anyone think that these formats were a mistake, or that the format made the winnings low? I like the clock format although it is very stressful, having to answer most of the last 5 questions in only 45 seconds. I personally think that the shuffle format's music was great, although the format was not so great. I also like the Hot Seat format because of its music, although this is just my honest opinion. I encourage you to post with why this format is your least favorite.
|
|
|
Post by mysteryman123 on Aug 13, 2017 7:41:22 GMT -5
There should be an option to change your vote. I didn't see the "least favorite" part of the question. I absoultely hated the US clock format, and to top it of, Meredith Vieira was my least favorite host.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2017 9:46:56 GMT -5
My least favorite format was the shuffle one. The music just didn't have the same feeling, it wasn't dramatic. I think that the US Clock one may be my favorite one though, because it was fast paced and I especially loved the cues. I missed the Fastest Finger First though.
|
|
|
Post by Pachirisu on Aug 13, 2017 11:03:44 GMT -5
Nuttermit, I personally disagree with the music part, because I am very fond of some of the soundtracks of the formats of Shuffle and 2016-. I do agree with how people think it's corrupted because, to be fair, it is, and all questions are the same difficulty, making it easier to get to round 2. As a result, question writers have to ramp up the difficulty. Just compare Josina Reaves' question to any question from Tournament of Ten.
|
|
|
Post by JCEurovision on Aug 14, 2017 2:03:21 GMT -5
My least favorite is the 12-question format, because that doesn't add up to the authenticity of the Millionaire franchise.
|
|
|
Post by millionaireloveruk on Aug 14, 2017 11:17:38 GMT -5
The two I went with were Shuffle and Hot Seat. For me, there is nothing Millionaire-like with the Shuffle format. All the other formats (except Hot Seat) could boast that it was fair, and that every contestant had roughly the same chance of winning a lot of money, but Shuffle removed that entirely, even more so with only one lifeline that could help you to win anything. Two contestants could both play the same game (ATA on Q1, Jump Q2&3, walk on Q4, for example), and one could win $12,500 and the other could (theoretically) only win fifty bucks, which isn't right. Although the $1,000 consolation helped to rectify this a little, removing the original safety nets meant you could lose up to sixty-something grand, a ridiculous amount of money to face losing on the tenth question. The music for the Shuffle format was just dreadful. The Round 1 music was boring and didn't fit Millionaire at all. The fact that the same Final, Correct, Incorrect and Lights Down music was played the entire way up the money tree was also very bad, completely ruining everything that the Strachan's original score did. The question beds for Round 2 didn't provide the tension like the original tier three music did. the $1,000,000 Background music should be like the original, which even the Rave music managed to do.
Hot Seat, meanwhile, isn't much better. In terms of soundtrack, at least they kept some Strachan pieces, but the question music for that really isn't great, in my opinion. Unlike Shuffle, however, Hot Seat does have a good opening theme. However, I feel that the Hot Seat format could have used the entire Rave format, which probably would have worked quite well with the faster-paced game. Hot Seat's format is probably the worst way that 2WayTraffic tried to butcher the show all together. Six people playing for one prize isn't fair on anybody, except the person who wins. That kind of game is much more of a daytime thing, a place Millionaire really doesn't belong. In the UK, at least, I think the highest top prize available in Daytime now is £10,000 (especially now Deal or No Deal has been cancelled), so offering the equivalent of £606,000 on a Daytime-ish show doesn't really feel right. Big prizes should be reserved for Primetime to draw the viewers in, and not wasted at 5pm-ish, and especially not against a much better format than Hot Seat, The Chase. Another problem with Hot Seat is that someone could get the first 13 questions right and have won absolutely nothing. Then, they could get the last question wrong, and suddenly player 2 waltzes in and can win A$250,000 without doing barely anything. How ridiculous is that?
If I had to score the formats, Shuffle would get about 2/10 due to rubbish music, an awful format and no fairness, and Hot Seat would get about 5/10 due to a rubbish format and no fairness, but the fact the music is half-decent helps it a little.
|
|
|
Post by Pachirisu on Aug 14, 2017 14:51:38 GMT -5
millionaireloveruk, With Hot Seat I think that the soundtracks are pretty good. However, I think that the format itself is also kind of bad. If someone answered the AU$1,000 question correctly they should at least get $1,000 when they answer incorrectly. This proves that Hot Seat isn't really designed to give away money as it was marketed, also mentioned in my study on the average winnings on each format.
|
|
|
Post by thepixelpolygon on Aug 14, 2017 19:10:29 GMT -5
My 2 least favorite formats are the shuffle format and the Hot Seat format. Both of these formats aren't at all dramatic, especially with the lighting and music taking away all the tension and drama. The Hot Seat format in particular doesn't look it it would be a really successful format like 2WayTraffic makes you believe, which is really bad because if we're talking about a top prize of $1000000, you better make sure it would be a REALLY good show like the classic was. At least they kept some Strachan music in there. But the shuffle format I hate even more. Not only is the new music horrible and the lighting is way too bright (sounds familiar?) as I've mentioned before, but the gameplay itself is as far away from the show's roots as possible. The absence of 2 lifelines in favor of skipping questions is really questionable. But my biggest complaint about the gameplay is the shuffling itself. I feel that shuffling the money amounts takes away from the excitement of the grand prize, shifting the focus instead to the shuffling gimmick and how much money lies underneath the questions because you're instead waiting to see how much money is under the question instead of whether or not the contestant will actually reach the jackpot. Just as an honorable mention, I'm going to mention the 2016 format. I mean, I don't hate it, but I don't like it, either. The reason being the lighting and music, and also the fact that they cut to the screen after a 'woo' (or something like that) instead of filming the contestant's reaction for more than a split second.
|
|